Paper detail

Theoretical explanation of electric field-induced superconductive critical temperature shifts in Indium thin films

We calculate the effect of a static electric field on the superconductive critical temperature of Indium thin films in the framework of proximity effect Eliashberg theory, in order to explain 60 years old experimental data. Since in the theoretical model we employ all quantities of interest can be computed ab-initio (i.e. electronic densities of states, Fermi energy shifts and Eliashberg spectral functions), the only free parameter is in general the thickness of the surface layer where the electric field acts. However, in the weak electrostatic field limit Thomas-Fermi approximation is still valid and therefore no free parameters are left, as this perturbed layer is known to have a thickness of the order of the Thomas-Fermi screening length. We show that the theoretical model can reproduce experimental data, even when the magnitude of the induced charge densities are so small to be usually neglected.

preprint2019arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.