Paper detail

Theoretical estimates for flat voids coalescence by internal necking

Coalescence of voids by internal necking is in most cases the last microscopic event related to ductile fracture and corresponds to a localized plastic flow between adjacent voids. Macroscopic load associated to the onset of coalescence is classically estimated based on limit analysis. However, a rigorous upper-bound mathematical expression for the limitload required for flat voids coalescence that remains finite for penny-shaped voids/cracks is still unavailable. Therefore, based on limit analysis, theoretical upper-bound estimates - both integral expression and closed-form formula - are obtained for the limit-load of cylindrical flat voids in cylindrical unit-cell subjected to boundary conditions allowing the assessment of coalescence, for axisymmetric stress state. These estimates, leading to finite limit-loads for pennyshaped cracks, are shown to be in very good agreement with numerical limit analysis, for both cylindrical and spheroidal voids. Approximate formula is also given for coalescence under combined tension and shear loading. These coalescence criteria can thus be used to predict onset of coalescence of voids by internal necking in ductile fracture modelling.

preprint2016arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.