Paper detail

Theoretical determination of polarizability and magnetic susceptibility of neon

We report theoretical determination of the dipole polarizability of the neon atom, including its frequency dependence. Corrections for the relativistic, quantum electrodynamics, finite nuclear mass, and finite nuclear size effects are taken into account. We obtain the value $α_0=2.66080(36)$ for the static polarizability, and $α_2=2.850(7)$ and $α_4=4.932(14)$ for the first two polarizability dispersion coefficients (Cauchy moments); all values are in atomic units (a.u.). In the case of static polarizability, our result agrees with the best experimental determination [C. Gaiser and B. Fellmuth, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 123203 (2018)], but our estimated uncertainty is significantly larger. For the dispersion coefficients, the results obtained in this work appear to be the most accurate to date overall compared to published theoretical and experimental data. We also calculated the static magnetic susceptibility of the neon atom, needed to obtain the refractive index of gaseous neon. Our result, $χ_0 = -8.484(19) \cdot 10^{-5}$ a.u., is about 9% larger in absolute value than the recommended experimental value [CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, CRC Press, 2019, p. 4-145].

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.