Paper detail

Theoretical confirmation of Feynman's hypothesis on the creation of circular vortices in Bose-Einstein condensates: III

In two preceding papers (Infeld and Senatorski 2003 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 15 5865, and Senatorski and Infeld 2004 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 16 6589) the authors confirmed Feynman's hypothesis on how circular vortices can be created from oppositely polarized pairs of linear vortices (first paper), and then gave examples of the creation of several different circular vortices from one linear pair (second paper). Here in part III, we give two classes of examples of how the vortices can interact. The first confirms the intuition that the reconnection processes which join two interacting vortex lines into one, practically do not occur. The second shows that new circular vortices can also be created from pairs of oppositely polarized coaxial circular vortices. This seems to contradict the results for such pairs given in Koplik and Levine 1996 Phys. Rev. Lett. 76 4745.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.