Paper detail

Theoretical aspects of $D^0-\bar{D}^0$ mixing

Observables in the $D^0-\bar{D}^0$ mixing can be theoretically analyzed by the operator product expansion (OPE), in which $1/m_c$ is regarded as an expansion parameter. Since the contributions of four-quark operators are strongly suppressed by the Glashow-Iliopoulos-Maiani (GIM) mechanism, the order of magnitude of the width difference is still not reproduced in the OPE analysis. In view of this issue, quark-hadron duality, an assumption that is tacitly made in the OPE, is studied for the $D^0-\bar{D}^0$ mixing. In particular, the exclusive width difference and the inclusive counterpart can be compared within the 't Hooft model, two-dimensional QCD in the large-$N_c$ limit. It is shown that the order of magnitude of the exclusive width difference is enhanced relative to the 4D-like inclusive contributions of the four-quark operators, that is qualitatively consistent with the realistic observation of the $D^0-\bar{D}^0$ mixing.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.