Paper detail

Theoretical and Observational Aspecs in Metric-Affine Gravity: A field theoretic perspective

In this PhD thesis we deal with several theoretical and phenomenological apsects of metric-affine theories of gravity. Concretely, we first give a broad introduction to the necessary tools to understand the framework and elaborate on some subtleties of the minimal coupling prescription between geometry and matter in presence of torsion and nonmetricity. Then we dedicate the central part of the thesis to study the structure of Ricci Based gravity (RBG) theories, which will be of later use to understand generic properties of metric-affine theories. We begin by analysing the structure of the RBG field equations and nontrivial aspects of their solution space. We then analyse the abrosption spectra of some spherically symmetric solutions. Then, we show that, if the projective symmetry in these theories is explicitly broken, then there arise ghost degrees of freedom, and we argue that this will be a generic feature of metric-affine gravity theories. Having done this, we analyse metricafine theories through the EFT lens, showing how the nonmetricity tkes a particular form in generic theories where the symmetrised Ricci tensor appears in the action beyond the Einstein-Hilbert term. This sources effective interactions that we use to place tight constraints to these theories. In the third part of the thesis we present a miscelanea of works which are not so related to the structure of RBG theories. We begin by studying a model for spontaneous breaking of Lorentz symmetry, namely the bumblebee model, in the metric-affine approach. In the following chapter we generalise a conformal invariant definition of proper time given by Perlick to the case with general nonmetricity. Finally, we present arguments that show that the recently proposed D4EGB theory is not well defined in its original form. We finish with a brief outlook.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.