Paper detail

The z = 9-10 galaxy population in the Hubble Frontier Fields and CLASH surveys: The z=9 LF and further evidence for a smooth decline in UV luminosity at z >= 8

We present the results of a search for z=9-10 galaxies within the first 8 pointings of the Hubble Frontier Fields (HFF) (4 clusters plus 4 parallel fields) and 20 cluster fields from the CLASH survey. Combined with our previous analysis of the Hubble Ultra-Deep field (HUDF), we have now completed a search for z=9-10 galaxies over ~130 sq. arcmin, across 29 HST WFC3/IR pointings. As in our recent study of the first two HFF fields, we confine our primary search for high-redshift candidates in the HFF imaging to the uniformly deep (i.e. sigma_160>30 AB mag in 0.5-arcsec diameter apertures), relatively low magnification regions. In the CLASH fields our search was confined to uniformly deep regions where sigma_160>28.8 AB mag. Our SED fitting analysis unveils a sample of 33 galaxy candidates at z_phot>=8.4, five of which have primary photometric redshift solutions in the range 9.6<z_phot<11.2. By calculating a de-lensed effective volume for each candidate, the improved statistics and reduced cosmic variance provided by our new sample allows a more accurate determination of the UV-selected galaxy luminosity function (LF) at z~9. Our new results strengthen our previous conclusion that the LF appears to evolve smoothly from z=8 to z=9, an evolution which can be equally well modelled by a factor of ~2 drop in density, or a dimming of ~0.5 mag in M*. Moreover, based on our new sample, we are able to place initial constraints on the z=10 LF, finding that the number density at M_1500 ~ -19.7 is log(phi) = -4.1 (+0.2,-0.3), a factor of ~2 lower than at z=9. Finally, we use our new results to re-visit the issue of the decline in UV luminosity density at z>=8. We conclude that the data continue to support a smooth decline in rho_UV over the redshift interval 6<z<10, in agreement with simple models of early galaxy evolution driven by the growth in the underlying dark matter halo mass function.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.