Paper detail

The Young Star Cluster System in the Antennae: Evidence for a Turnover in the luminosity function

The luminosity functions (LFs) of star cluster systems (i.e. the number of clusters per luminosity interval) are vital diagnostics to probe the conditions of star cluster formation. Early studies have revealed a clear dichotomy between old globular clusters and young clusters, with the former characterised by Gaussian-shaped LFs, and the latter following a power law. Recently, this view was challenged by studies of galaxy merger remnants and post-starburst galaxies. In this paper we re-evaluate the young ($\lta$ few hundreds of Myrs, with the majority $\lta$ few tens of Myrs) star cluster system in the ongoing spiral-spiral major merger system NGC 4038/39, the "Antennae" galaxies. The Antennae galaxies represent a very active and complex star-forming environment, which hampers cluster selection and photometry as well as the determination of observational completeness fractions. A main issue of concern is the large number of bright young stars contained in most earlier studies, which we carefully exclude from our cluster sample by accurately determining the source sizes. The resulting LFs are fitted both with Gaussian and with power-law distributions, taking into account both the observational completeness fractions and photometric errors, and compared using a likelihood ratio test. The likelihood ratio results are rigidly evaluated using Monte Carlo simulations. We perform a number of additional tests, e.g. with subsets of the total sample, all confirming our main result: that a Gaussian distribution fits the observed LFs of clusters in this preferentially very young cluster system significantly better than a power-law distribution, at a (statistical) error probability of less than 0.5 per cent.

preprint2007arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.