Paper detail

The Yield Volume Fraction approach to the description of the stress-strain curve of a nickel-base superalloy

The stress-strain curves of most metallic alloys are often described using the relatively simple Ramberg-Osgood relationship. Whilst this description captures the overall stress-strain curve under monotonic tensile loading with reasonable overall accuracy, it often presents significant errors in the immediate post-yield region where the interplay between the elastic and plastic strains is particularly significant. This study proposes and develops a new approach to the description of the tensile stress-strain curve based on the Yield Volume Fraction (YVF) function. The YVF description provides an excellent match to experimental stress-strain curves based on a physically meaningful parameter that corresponds to the cumulative volume fraction of the polycrystal that undergoes yielding during monotonic deformation. The statistical nature of the polycrystal yield phenomenon is highlighted by the fact that the YVF model achieves good agreement with observations when the lognormal and extreme value distributions are employed to express the cumulative density function for the total yield volume fraction, and the probability density function for the incremental yield volume fraction, respectively. This proposed approach is compared with crystal plasticity finite element (CPFE) simulations and the Ramberg-Osgood model, along with experimental observations. The results highlight the potential of more extensive use of statistical methods in the description of material deformation response for improved design.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.