Paper detail

The XMM-Newton Wide field survey in the COSMOS field: redshift evolution of AGN bias and subdominant role of mergers in triggering moderate luminosity AGN at redshift up to 2.2

We present a study of the redshift evolution of the projected correlation function of 593 X-ray selected AGN with I_AB<23 and spectroscopic redshifts z<4, extracted from the 0.5-2 keV X-ray mosaic of the 2.13 deg^2 XMM-COSMOS survey. We introduce a method to estimate the average bias of the AGN sample and the mass of AGN hosting halos, solving the sample variance using the halo model and taking into account the growth of the structure over time. We find evidence of a redshift evolution of the bias factor for the total population of XMM-COSMOS AGN from b(z=0.92)=2.30 +/- 0.11 to b(z=1.94)=4.37 +/- 0.27 with an average mass of the hosting DM halos logM [h^-1 M_sun] ~ 13.12 +/- 0.12 that remains constant at all z < 2. Splitting our sample into broad optical lines AGN (BL), AGN without broad optical lines (NL) and X-ray unobscured and obscured AGN, we observe an increase of the bias with redshift in the range z=0.7-2.25 and z=0.6-1.5 which corresponds to a constant halo mass logM [h^-1 M_sun] ~ 13.28 +/- 0.07 and logM [h^-1 M_sun] ~ 13.00 +/- 0.06 for BL /X-ray unobscured AGN and NL/X-ray obscured AGN, respectively. The theoretical models which assume a quasar phase triggered by major mergers can not reproduce the high bias factors and DM halo masses found for X-ray selected BL AGN with L_BOL ~ 2e45 erg s^-1. Our work extends up to z ~ 2.2 the z <= 1 statement that, for moderate luminosity X-ray selected BL AGN, the contribution from major mergers is outnumbered by other processes, possibly secular such as tidal disruptions or disk instabilities.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access17 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.