Paper detail

The XMM-Newton view of the radio loud narrow line Seyfert1 galaxy PMN J0948+0022

We analysed the archival XMM-Newton data of the radio loud narrow line Seyfert1 galaxy PMN J0948+0022 in the energy range 0.3--10.0 keV. The X-ray data reveal that the spectrum in the 0.3--10.0 keV energy band is not a simple power-law as previously described in the literature. Instead it consists of a power-law with soft excess below 2.5 keV. The X-ray spectrum was fitted with four different models and it was shown the soft excess component of the spectrum in the 0.3--2.5 keV energy range could be described reasonably well within the framework of the thermal Comptonization model as well as relativistically blurred reflection model. The power-law component required to fit the spectrum beyond 2.5 keV was found to be rather hard compared to the ones observed in other unobscured active galactic nuclei. It is also shown that the Swift/XRT spectrum from the source could not reveal the soft excess component due to poor statistics. The fractional variability estimated from XMM-Newton data indicates the presence of independently varying components in the spectrum above and below 1 keV.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.