Paper detail

The X-Shaped Milky Way Bulge in OGLE-III Photometry and in N-Body Models

We model the split red clump of the Galactic bulge in OGLE-III photometry, and compare the results to predictions from two N-body models. Our analysis yields precise maps of the brightness of the two red clumps, the fraction of stars in the more distant peak, and their combined surface density. We compare the observations to predictions from two N-body models previously used in the literature. Both models correctly predict several features as long as one assumes an angle $α_{\rm{Bar}} \approx 30^{\circ}$ between the Galactic bar's major axis and the line of sight to the Galactic centre. In particular that the fraction of stars in the faint red clump should decrease with increasing longitude. The biggest discrepancies between models and data are in the rate of decline of the combined surface density of red clump stars toward negative longitudes and of the brightness difference between the two red clumps toward positive longitudes, with neither discrepancy exceeding $\sim$25% in amplitude. Our analysis of the red giant luminosity function also yields an estimate of the red giant branch bump parameters toward these high-latitude fields, and evidence for a high rate ($\sim$25%) of disk contamination in the bulge at the colour and magnitude of the red clump, with the disk contamination rate increasing toward sightlines further distant from the plane.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access14 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.