Paper detail

The X-ray to optical-UV luminosity ratio of X-ray selected Type 1 AGN in XMM-COSMOS

We present a study of the X-ray to optical properties of a sample of 545 X-ray selected Type 1 AGN, from the XMM-COSMOS survey, over a wide range of redshifts ($0.04<\z<4.25$) and X-ray luminosities ($40.6 \leq \Log \Lhard \leq 45.3$). About 60% of them are spectroscopically identified Type 1 AGN, while the others have a reliable photometric redshift and are classified as Type 1 AGN on the basis of their multi-band Spectral Energy Distributions. We discuss the relationship between UV and X-ray luminosity, as parameterized by the $\alphaox$ spectral slope, and its dependence on redshift and luminosity. We compare our findings with previous investigations of optically selected broad-line AGN (mostly from SDSS). A highly significant correlation between $\alphaox$ and $\lo$ is found, in agreement with previous investigations of optically selected samples. We calculate bolometric corrections, $\kbol$, for the whole sample using hard X-ray luminosities ($\Lhard$), and the Eddington ratios for a subsample of 150 objects for which black hole mass estimates are available. We confirm the trend of increasing bolometric correction with increasing Eddington ratio as proposed in previous works. A tight correlation is found between $\alphaox$ and $\kbol$, which can be used to estimate accurate bolometric corrections using only optical and X-ray data. We find a significant correlation between $\alphaox$ and Eddington ratio, in which $\alphaox$ increases for increasing Eddington ratios.

preprint2009arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access32 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.