Paper detail

The X-ray to [Ne V]3426 flux ratio: discovering heavily obscured AGN in the distant Universe

We investigate the possibility of using the ratio between the 2-10 keV flux and the [Ne V]3426 emission line flux (X/NeV) as a diagnostic diagram to discover heavily obscured, possibly Compton-Thick Active Galactic Nuclei (AGN) up to z~1.5. First, we calibrate a relation between X/NeV and the cold absorbing column density N_H using a sample of 74 bright, nearby Seyferts with both X-ray and [Ne V] data available in the literature. Similarly to what is found for the X-ray to [O III]5007 flux ratio (X/OIII), we found that the X/NeV ratio decreases towards large column densities. Essentially all local Seyferts with X/NeV values below 15 are found to be Compton-Thick objects. Second, we apply this diagnostic diagram to different samples of distant obscured and unobscured QSOs in the SDSS: blue, unobscured, type-1 QSOs in the redshift range z=[0.1-1.5] show X/NeV values typical of unobscured Seyfert 1s in the local Universe. Conversely, SDSS type-2 QSOs at z~0.5 classified either as Compton-Thick or Compton-Thin on the basis of their X/OIII ratio, would have been mostly classified in the same way based on the X/NeV ratio. We apply the X/NeV diagnostic diagram to 9 SDSS obscured QSOs in the redshift range z=[0.85-1.31], selected by means of their prominent [Ne V]3426 line and observed with Chandra ACIS-S for 10ks each. Based on the X/NeV ratio, complemented by X-ray spectral analysis, 2 objects appear good Compton-Thick QSO candidates, 4 objects appear as Compton-Thin QSOs, while 3 have an ambiguous classification. When excluding from the sample broad lined QSOs with a red continuum and thus considering only genuine narrow-line objects, the efficiency in selecting Compton-Thick QSOs through the [Ne V] line is about 50% (with large errors, though), more similar to what is achieved with [O III] selection. [abridged]

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.