Paper detail

The X-ray Spectral Variability of the Seyfert Galaxy NGC 3227

(Abridged) We present the results from {\it ASCA} observations of NGC 3227 along with those from a {\it ROSAT} observation. The 0.6--10 keV continuum is consistent with a powerlaw with $Γ\sim 1.6$, flatter than that typically observed in Seyfert galaxies. Fe $K$-shell emission is observed with an EW and profile typical of Seyfert 1 galaxies. The {\it ASCA} observations in 1993 reveal absorption by a screen $N_{H,z}^{ion} \simeq 3\times10^{21} cm^{-2}}$ of ionized material with $U_X \simeq 0.01$. Joint analysis of the {\it ASCA} and {\it ROSAT} data show an additional screen of neutral material instrinsic to NGC 3227 with $N_{H,z}^{neu} \sim $few$\times10^{20} cm^{-2}}$. NGC 3227 exhibits spectral variability both within and between the observations, due to short-term variability in the continuum emission and longer-term variability in the absorption. Time-resolved spectroscopy show the continuum steepened by $ΔΓ\simeq 0.1$ during a flare of duration $\sim 10^4$s. The column increased by a factor of $\sim10$ by the 1995 epoch, while the continuum is consistent with that observed in 1993. The 1995 data also show evidence that the warm absorber allows $\sim$10% of the nuclear emission to escape without attenuation.

preprint1998arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access7 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.