Paper detail

The X-ray Energy Dependence of the Relation between Optical and X-ray Emission in Quasars

We develop a new approach to the well-studied anti-correlation between the optical-to-X-ray spectral index, alpha_ox, and the monochromatic optical luminosity, l_opt. By cross-correlating the SDSS DR5 quasar catalog with the XMM-Newton archive, we create a sample of 327 quasars with X-ray S/N > 6, where both optical and X-ray spectra are available. This allows alpha_ox to be defined at arbitrary frequencies, rather than the standard 2500 Angstroms and 2 keV. We find that while the choice of optical wavelength does not strongly influence the alpha_ox-l_opt relation, the slope of the relation does depend on the choice of X-ray energy. The slope of the relation becomes steeper when alpha_ox is defined at low (~ 1 keV) X-ray energies. This change is significant when compared to the slope predicted by a decrease in the baseline over which alpha_ox is defined. The slopes are also marginally flatter than predicted at high (~ 10 keV) X-ray energies. Partial correlation tests show that while the primary driver of alpha_ox is l_opt, the Eddington ratio correlates strongly with alpha_ox when l_opt is taken into account, so accretion rate may help explain these results. We combine the alpha_ox-l_opt and Gamma -L_bol/L_Edd relations to naturally explain two results: 1) the existence of the Gamma-l_x relation as reported in Young et al. (2009) and 2) the lack of a Gamma-l_opt relation. The consistency of the optical/X-ray correlations establishes a more complete framework for understanding the relation between quasar emission mechanisms. We also discuss two correlations with the hard X-ray bolometric correction, which we show correlates with both alpha_ox and Eddington ratio. This confirms that an increase in accretion rate correlates with a decrease in the fraction of up-scattered disk photons.

preprint2009arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.