Paper detail

The X-ray emission of gamma Cassiopeiae during the 2020-2021 disc eruption

gamma Cas is known for its hard and intense X-ray emission that could trace accretion by a compact companion, wind interaction with a hot sub-dwarf companion, or magnetic interaction between the star and its Be decretion disc. These scenarios should lead to diverse dependences of the hard X-ray emission on disc density. We collected X-ray observations of gamma Cas during an episode of enhanced disc activity around January 2021. We investigate the variations in the disc properties using time series of dedicated optical spectroscopy and existing broadband photometry. Epoch-dependent Doppler maps of the H-alpha, H-beta, and He I 5876 emission lines are built to characterise the emission regions in velocity space. We analyse 4 XMM-Newton observations taken at key phases of the enhanced disc activity episode. Archival data are used to study the long-term correlation between optical and X-ray emission. Optical spectroscopy unveils an increase in the radial extent of the emission regions during the episode of enhanced disc activity, whilst no increase in the V-band flux is recorded. Doppler maps do not reveal any stable feature in the disc resulting from the putative action of the companion on the outer parts of the Be disc. No increase in the hard emission is observed in relation to the enhanced disc activity. However, at two occasions, the soft X-ray emission of gamma Cas is strongly attenuated, suggesting more efficient obscuration by a large flaring Be disc. There is a strong correlation between the long-term variations in the X-ray flux and in the V-band photometry. The observed behaviour of gamma Cas suggests no direct link between the properties of the outer regions of the Be disc and the hard X-ray emission, but favours a link between the level of X-ray emission and the properties of the inner part of the Be disc. These results thus disfavour an accretion or colliding wind scenario.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.