Paper detail

The X-ray activity of the young solar-like star Kepler-63 and the structure of its corona

The X-ray satellite XMM-Newton has so far revealed coronal cycles in seven solar-like stars. In this sample, the youngest stars $ε$ Eridani (400 Myr) and $ι$ Horologii (600 Myr) display the shortest X-ray cycles and the smallest cycle amplitudes. The corona of $ε$ Eridani was modelled in terms of solar magnetic structures (active regions, cores of active regions and flares) at varying filling factors. The study revealed that 65-95% of its corona is covered with magnetic structures, and this was held responsible for the low X-ray cycle amplitude. It was also hypothesized that the basal surface coverage with magnetic structures may be higher on the corona of younger solar-like stars. To investigate this hypothesis, we study the solar-like star Kepler-63 in the X-rays. With an age of 210 Myr and a photospheric cycle of 1.27 yr, it is so far the youngest star observed in X-rays with the aim of revealing a coronal cycle. In the long-term X-ray lightcurve we do not reveal a periodic variation of the X-ray luminosity, but a factor two change would be possible. As for the case of $ε$ Eridani, we modelled the corona of Kepler-63 with magnetic structures observed on the Sun. The study suggests that 100% of the corona is composed of cores and flares of Class M, justifying the absence of an X-ray cycle and confirming the analogous results derived for $ε$ Eridani. Finally, we establish an empirical relation between the cycle amplitude and the X-ray surface flux . From the absence of a coronal cycle in Kepler-63 we infer that stars with higher X-ray flux than Kepler-63 must host a significant fraction of higher-energetic flares than those necessary to model the corona of Kepler-63. Our study opens new ground for studies of the solar-stellar analogy and the joint exploration of resolved and unresolved variability in stellar X-ray lightcurves.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.