Paper detail

The Worst Case Number of Questions in Generalized AB Game with and without White-peg Answers

The AB game is a two-player game, where the codemaker has to choose a secret code and the codebreaker has to guess it in as few questions as possible. It is a variant of the famous Mastermind game, with the only difference that all pegs in both, the secret and the questions must have distinct colors. In this work, we consider the Generalized AB game, where for given arbitrary numbers $p$, $c$ with $p \le c$ the secret code consists of $p$ pegs each having one of $c$ colors and the answer consists only of a number of black and white pegs. There the number of black pegs equals the number of pegs matching in the corresponding question and the secret in position and color, and the number of white pegs equals the additional number of pegs matching in the corresponding question and the secret only in color. We consider also a variant of the Generalized AB game, where the information of white pegs is omitted. This variant is called Generalized Black-peg AB game. Let $\ab(p,c)$ and $\abb(p,c)$ be the worst case number of questions for Generalized AB game and Generalized Black-peg AB game, respectively. Combining a computer program with theoretical considerations, we confirm known exact values of $\ab(2,c)$ and $\ab(3,c)$ and prove tight bounds for $\ab(4,c)$. Furthermore, we present exact values for $\abb(2,c)$ and $\abb(3,c)$ and tight bounds for $\abb(4,c)$.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.