Paper detail

The Wolf-Rayet population of the nearby barred spiral galaxy NGC 5068 uncovered by VLT and Gemini

We present a narrow-band VLT/FORS1 imaging survey of the SAB(rs)cd spiral galaxy NGC 5068, located at a distance of 5.45Mpc, from which 160 candidate Wolf-Rayet sources have been identified, of which 59 cases possess statistically significant 4686 excesses. Follow-up Gemini/GMOS spectroscopy of 64 candidates, representing 40% of the complete photometric catalogue, confirms Wolf-Rayet signatures in 30 instances, corresponding to a 47% success rate. 21 out of 22 statistically significant photometric sources are spectroscopically confirmed. Nebular emission detected in 30% of the Wolf-Rayet candidates spectrally observed, which enable a re-assessment of the metallicity gradient in NGC 5068. A central metallicity of log(O/H)+12 ~ 8.74 is obtained, declining to 8.23 at R_25. We combine our spectroscopy with archival Halpha images of NGC 5068 to estimate a current star formation rate of 0.63(+0.11/-0.13)Msun/yr, and provide a catalogue of the 28 brightest HII regions from our own continuum subtracted Halpha images, of which ~17 qualify as giant HII regions. Spectroscopically, we identify 24 WC and 18 WN-type Wolf-Rayet stars within 30 sources since emission line fluxes indicate multiple Wolf-Rayet stars in several cases. We estimate an additional ~66 Wolf-Rayet stars from the remaining photometric candidates, although sensitivity limits will lead to an incomplete census of visually faint WN stars, from which we estimate a global population of ~170 Wolf-Rayet stars. Based on the Halpha-derived O star population of NGC 5068 and N(WR)/N(O)~0.03, representative of the LMC, we would expect a larger Wolf-Rayet population of 270 stars. Finally, we have compared the spatial distribution of spectroscopically confirmed WN and WC stars with SDSS-derived supernovae, and find both WN and WC stars to be most consistent with the parent population of Type Ib SNe.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.