Paper detail

The WISSH quasars project VII. The impact of extreme radiative field in the accretion disk and X-ray corona interplay

Hyperluminous quasars ($L_{\rm bol}\gtrsim 10^{47}$ erg s$^{-1}$) are ideal laboratories to study the interaction and impact of extreme radiative field and the most powerful winds in the AGN nuclear regions. They typically exhibit low coronal X-ray luminosity ($L_{\rm X}$) compared to the UV and MIR radiative outputs ($L_{\rm UV}$ and $L_{\rm MIR}$) with a non-negligible fraction of them reporting even $\sim$1 dex weaker $L_{\rm X}$ compared to the prediction of the well established $L_{\rm X}$-$L_{\rm UV}$ and $L_{\rm X}$-$L_{\rm MIR}$ relations followed by the bulk of the AGN population. We report in our WISE/SDSS-selected Hyperluminous (WISSH) $z=2-4$ broad-line quasar sample, the discovery of a dependence between the intrinsic 2-10 keV luminosity ($L_{\rm 2-10}$) and the blueshifted velocity of the CIV emission line ($v_{\rm CIV}$) indicative of accretion disc winds. In particular, sources with fastest winds ($v_{\rm CIV}\gtrsim 3000~\rm km s^{-1}$) possess $\sim$0.5-1 dex lower $L_{\rm 2-10}$ than sources with negligible $v_{\rm CIV}$. No similar dependence is found on $L_{\rm UV}$, $L_{\rm MIR}$, $L_{\rm bol}$, photon index and absorption column density. We interpret these findings in the context of accretion disc wind models. Both magnetohydrodynamic and line-driven models can qualitatively explain the reported relations as a consequence of X-ray shielding from the inner wind regions. In case of line-driven winds, the launch of fast winds is favoured by a reduced X-ray emission, and we speculate that these winds may play a role in directly limiting the coronal hard X-ray production.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access17 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.