Paper detail

The weight and Lindelöf property in spaces and topological groups

We show that if $Y$ is a dense subspace of a Tychonoff space $X$, then $w(X)\leq nw(Y)^{Nag(Y)}$, where $Nag(Y)$ is the Nagami number of $Y$. In particular, if $Y$ is a Lindelöf $Σ$-space, then $w(X)\leq nw(Y)^ω\leq nw(X)^ω$. Better upper bounds for the weight of topological groups are given. For example, if a topological group $H$ contains a dense subgroup $G$ such that $G$ is a Lindelöf $Σ$-space, then $w(H)=w(G)\leq ψ(G)^ω$. Further, if a Lindelöf $Σ$-space $X$ generates a dense subgroup of a topological group $H$, then $w(H)\leq 2^{ψ(X)}$. Several facts about subspaces of Hausdorff separable spaces are established. It is well known that the weight of a separable Hausdorff space $X$ can be as big as $2^{2^{\mathfrak c}}$, where ${\mathfrak c}=2^ω$. We prove on the one hand that if a regular Lindelöf $Σ$-space $Y$ is a subspace of a separable Hausdorff space, then $w(Y)\leq \mathfrak c$, and the same conclusion holds for a Lindelöf $P$-space $Y$. On the other hand, we present an example of a countably compact topological group $G$ which is homeomorphic to a subspace of a separable Hausdorff space and satisfies $w(G)=2^{2^{\mathfrak c}}$, i.e. has the maximal possible weight.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.