Paper detail

The Weak Expectation Property and Riesz Interpolation

We show that Lance's weak expectation property is connected to tight Riesz interpolations in lattice theory. More precisely we first prove that if A \subset B(H) is a unital C*-subalgebra, where B(H) is the bounded linear operators on a Hilbert space H, then A has (2,2) tight Riesz interpolation property in B(H) (defined below). An extension of this requires an additional assumption on A: A has (2,3) tight Riesz interpolation property in B(H) at every matricial level if and only if A has the weak expectation property. Let $J = span{(1,1,-1,-1,-1)}$ in $C^5$ . We show that a unital C*-algebra A has the weak expectation property if and only if $A \otimesmin (C^5/J) = A \otimesmax (C^5/J)$ (here \otimesmin and \otimesmax are the minimal and the maximal operator system tensor products, respectively, and $C^5/J$ is the operator system quotient of $C^5$ by $J$). We express the Kirchberg conjecture (KC) in terms of a four dimensional operator system problem. We prove that KC has an affirmative answer if and only if $C^5/J$ has the double commutant expectation property if and only if $C5/J \otimesmin C5/J = C5/J \otimesc C5/J$ (here \otimesc represents the commuting operator system tensor product).

preprint2012arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.