Paper detail

The weak dependence of velocity dispersion on disk fractions, mass-to-light ratio and redshift: Implications for galaxy and black hole evolution

Velocity dispersion ($σ$) is a key driver for galaxy structure and evolution. We here present a comprehensive semi-empirical approach to compute $σ$ via detailed Jeans modelling assuming both a constant and scale-dependent mass-to-light ratio $M^*/L$. We compare with a large sample of local galaxies from MaNGA and find that both models can reproduce the Faber-Jackson (FJ) relation and the weak dependence of $σ$ on bulge-to-total ratio $B/T$ (for $B/T\gtrsim 0.25$). The dynamical-to-stellar mass ratio within $R\lesssim R_e$ can be fully accounted for by a gradient in $M^*/L$. We then build velocity dispersion evolutionary tracks $σ_{ap}[M^*,z]$ (within an aperture) along the main progenitor dark matter haloes assigning stellar masses, effective radii and Sersic indices via a variety of abundance matching and empirically motivated relations. We find: 1) clear evidence for downsizing in $σ_{ap}[M^*,z]$ along the progenitor tracks; 2) at fixed stellar mass $σ\propto(1+z)^{0.2-0.3}$ depending on the presence or not of a gradient in $M^*/L$. We extract $σ_{ap}[M^*,z]$ from the TNG50 hydrodynamic simulation and find very similar results to our models with constant $M^*/L$. The increasing dark matter fraction within $R_e$ tends to flatten the $σ_{ap}[M^*,z]$ along the progenitors at $z \gtrsim 1$ in constant $M^*/L$ models, while $σ_{ap}[M^*,z]$ have a steeper evolution in the presence of a stellar gradient. We then show that a combination of mergers and gas accretion are likely responsible for the constant or increasing $σ_{ap}[M^*,z]$ with time. Finally, our $σ_{ap}[M^*,z]$ are consistent with a nearly constant and steep $M_{bh}-σ$ relation at $z\lesssim 2$, with black hole masses derived from the $L_X-M^*$ relation.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.