Paper detail

The warm gas atmosphere of the HD 100546 disk seen by Herschel (Evidence of a gas-rich, carbon-poor atmosphere?)

(Abridged) Context. With the Herschel Space Observatory, lines of simple molecules (C+, O, and CO) have been observed in the atmosphere of protoplanetary disks. When combined with ground-based [CI], all principle forms of carbon can be studied. The absence of neutral carbon [CI], which is predicted by models to be strong, can then be interpreted together with [CII] and carbon monoxide. Aims. We study the gas temperature, excitation, and chemical abundance of the simple carbon-bearing species by the method of chemical-physical modeling. We explore the sensitivity of the lines to the entering parameters and constrain the region from which the line radiation emerges. Methods. Numerical models of the radiative transfer are used together with a chemical network simulation and a calculation of the gas energetics to obtain the gas temperature. We present our new model, which is based on our previous models but includes several improvements. Results. A model of the disk around the Herbig Be star HD 100546 is able to reproduce the CO ladder together with the atomic fine-structure lines of [OI] and either [CI] or [CII]. We find that the high-J lines of CO can only be reproduced by a warm atmosphere with Tgas>>Tdust. The high-J CO observable with PACS are dominated from regions within some tens of AU. Conclusions. Only a warm atmosphere with Tgas>>Tdust can reproduce the CO ladder. The CO ladder together with [O I] and the upper limit to [CI] can be reproduced by models with a high gas/dust ratio and a low abundance of volatile carbon. These models however produce too small amounts of [CII]. Models with a low gas/dust ratio and more volatile carbon also reproduce CO and [OI], are in closer agreement with observations of [CII], but overproduce [CI]. Due to the uncertain origin of the [CII] emission, we prefer the high gas/dust ratio models, indicating a low abundance of volatile carbon.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.