Paper detail

The W-Z-Top Bags

We discuss a new family of multi-quanta bound states in the Standard Model, which exist due to the mutual Higgs-based attraction of the heaviest members of the SM, namely, gauge quanta $W,Z$ and (anti)top quarks, $\bar t, t $. We use a self-consistent mean-field approximation, up to a rather large particle number $N$. In this paper we do not focus on weakly-bound, non-relativistic bound states, but rather on "bags" in which the Higgs VEV is significantly modified/depleted. The minimal number $N$ above which such states appear strongly depends on the ratio of the Higgs mass to the masses of $W,Z,\bar{t}, t $: For a light Higgs mass $m_H \sim 50\, GeV$ bound states start from $N\sim O(10)$, but for a "realistic" Higgs mass, $m_H\sim 100\, GeV$, one finds metastable/bound $W,Z$ bags only for $N\sim O(1000)$. We also found that in the latter case pure top bags disappear for all N, although top quarks can still be well bound to the W-bags. Anticipating cosmological applications (discussed in a companion paper) of these bags as "doorway states" for baryosynthesis, we also consider the existence of such metastable bags at finite temperatures, when SM parameters such as Higgs, gauge and top masses are significantly modified.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.