Paper detail

The Vocal Signature of Social Anxiety: Exploration using Hypothesis-Testing and Machine-Learning Approaches

Background - Social anxiety (SA) is a common and debilitating condition, negatively affecting life quality even at sub-diagnostic thresholds. We sought to characterize SA's acoustic signature using hypothesis-testing and machine learning (ML) approaches. Methods - Participants formed spontaneous utterances responding to instructions to refuse or consent to commands of alleged peers. Vocal properties (e.g., intensity and duration) of these utterances were analyzed. Results - Our prediction that, as compared to low-SA (n=31), high-SA (n=32) individuals exhibit a less confident vocal speech signature, especially with respect to refusal utterances, was only partially supported by the classical hypothesis-testing approach. However, the results of the ML analyses and specifically the decision tree classifier were consistent with such speech patterns in SA. Using a Gaussian Process (GP) classifier, we were able to distinguish between high- and low-SA individuals with high (75.6%) accuracy and good (.83 AUC) separability. We also expected and found that vocal properties differentiated between refusal and consent utterances. Conclusions - Our findings provide further support for the usefulness of ML approach for the study of psychopathology, highlighting the utility of developing automatic techniques to create behavioral markers of SAD. Clinically, the simplicity and accessibility of these procedures may encourage people to seek professional help.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.