Paper detail

The VLT LBG Redshift Survey - IV. Gas and galaxies at z ~ 3 in observations and simulations

We use observations and simulation to study the relationship between star-forming galaxies and the intergalactic medium at z~3. The observed galaxy sample is based on spectroscopic redshift data from a combination of the VLT LBG Redshift Survey and Keck observations in fields centred on bright z>3 QSOs, whilst the simulation data is taken from GIMIC. In the simulation, we find that the dominant peculiar velocities are in the form of large-scale coherent motions of gas and galaxies. Gravitational infall of galaxies towards one another is also seen. At smaller scales, the peculiar velocities in the simulation over-predict the difference between the simulated real- and z-space galaxy correlation functions. Peculiar velocity pairs separated by <1Mpc/h have a smaller dispersion and explain the z-space correlation function better. The Lyα auto- and cross-correlation functions in the GIMIC simulation show infall smaller than implied by previous work. This reduced infall may be due to the galaxy wide outflows implemented in the simulation. The main challenge in comparing these simulated results with the observed correlation functions comes from the presence of velocity errors for the observed LBGs which dominate at ~1Mpc/h scales. When these are taken into account, the observed LBG correlation function is well matched by a simulated $M_*>10^9M_\odot$ galaxy sample. The simulated cross-correlation shows similar neutral gas densities around galaxies as are seen in the observations. The simulated and observed Lyα z-space autocorrelation functions agree well with each other. Our overall conclusion is that gas and galaxy peculiar velocities are towards the low end of expectation. Finally, little direct evidence is seen in either simulation or observations for high transmission near galaxies due to feedback. (Abridged)

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access7 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.