Paper detail

The VLT LBG Redshift Survey - III. The clustering and dynamics of Lyman-break galaxies at z ~ 3

We present a catalogue of 2135 galaxy redshifts from the VLT LBG Redshift Survey (VLRS), a spectroscopic survey of z ~ 3 galaxies in wide fields centred on background quasi-stellar objects. We have used deep optical imaging to select galaxies via the Lyman-break technique. Spectroscopy of the Lyman-break galaxies (LBGs) was then made using the Visible Multi-Object Spectrograph (VIMOS), giving a mean redshift of z=2.79. We analyse the clustering properties of the VLRS sample and also of the VLRS sample combined with the smaller area Keck-based survey of Steidel et al. From the semiprojected correlation function, wp(σ) we find that the results are well fit with a single power-law model, with clustering scale lengths of r0=3.46+-0.41 and 3.83+-0.24 Mpc/h, respectively. We note that the corresponding combined ξ(r) slope is flatter than for local galaxies at γ = 1.5-1.6 rather than γ=1.8. This flat slope is confirmed by the z-space correlation function, ξ(s), and in the range 10<s<100 Mpc/h the VLRS shows ~2.5σ excess over the Λ cold dark matter. This excess may be consistent with recent evidence for non-Gaussianity in clustering results at z~1. We then analyse the LBG z-space distortions using the 2D correlation function, ξ(σ, π), finding for the combined sample a large-scale infall parameter of $β$ = 0.38+-0.19 and a velocity dispersion of 420km/s. Based on our measured β, we are able to determine the gravitational growth rate, finding a value of f(z = 3)=0.99+-0.50 (or fσ8 = 0.26+-0.13), which is the highest redshift measurement of the growth rate via galaxy clustering and is consistent with ΛCDM. Finally, we constrain the mean halo mass for the LBG population, finding that the VLRS and combined sample suggest mean halo masses of log(MDM/Msun) = 11.57+-0.15 and 11.73+-0.07, respectively.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access15 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.