Paper detail

The VLT LBG Redshift Survey I: Clustering and Dynamics of ~1000 Galaxies at z~3

We present the initial imaging and spectroscopic data acquired as part of the VLT VIMOS Lyman-break galaxy Survey. UBR (or UBVI) imaging covers five 36'x36' fields centred on bright z>3 QSOs, allowing ~21,000 2<z<3.5 galaxy candidates to be selected using the Lyman-break technique. We performed spectroscopic follow-up using VIMOS, measuring redshifts for 1020 z>2 LBGs and 10 z>2 QSOs from a total of 19 VIMOS pointings. From the galaxy spectra, we observe a 625+-510 km/s velocity offset between the ISM absorption and Ly-alpha emission line redshifts. Using the photometric and spectroscopic catalogues, we have analysed the galaxy clustering at z~3. In the photometric case, the angular correlation function, w(theta), is well fit by a double power-law with clustering scale-length, r_0 = 3.19+0.32-0.54 Mpc/h for r < 1 Mpc/h and r_0 = 4.59+0.31-0.33 Mpc/h at larger scales. Using the redshift sample we estimate the semi-projected correlation function, w_p(sigma) and find r_0 = 3.67+0.23-0.24 Mpc/h for the VLT sample and r_0 = 3.98+0.14-0.15 Mpc/h for a combined VLT+Keck sample. From the z-space correlation functions and assuming the above xi(r) models, we find that the combined VLT and Keck surveys require a galaxy velocity dispersion, <w_z^2>^1/2 ~ 700 km/s, higher than the ~400 km/s found by previous authors. We also measure a value for the gravitational growth rate parameter of beta(z=3) = 0.48+-0.17, implying a low value for the bias of b = 2.06+1.1-0.5. This value is consistent with the galaxy clustering amplitude which gives b = 2.22+-0.16, assuming the standard cosmology, implying that the evolution of the gravitational growth rate is also consistent with Einstein gravity. We have compared our LBG clustering amplitudes with lower redshift measurements and find that the clustering strength is not inconsistent with that of low-redshift L* spirals for simple 'long-lived' galaxy models.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access14 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.