Paper detail

The visual lightcurve of comet C/1995 O1 (Hale-Bopp) from 1995-1999

The long-term brightness evolution of the great comet C/1995 O1 (Hale-Bopp) presented a remarkable opportunity to study the behavior of its coma over four years. We used approximately 2200 total visual magnitudes published in the International Comet Quarterly taken from 17 observers during the period of 1995 July - 1999 September to create a secular lightcurve. In order to account for observer differences, we present a novel algorithm to reduce scatter and increase precision in a lightcurve compiled from many sources. It is implemented in a publicly available code, ICQSPLITTER. This code addresses the differences among observers by using a self-consistent statistical approach, leading to a sharper lightcurve, and improving the precision of the measured slopes. To first order, the comet's lightcurve approximately follows a r$^{-4}$ response for both pre- and post-perihelion distances. Interestingly, the pre-perihelion data are better fit with a fifth-order polynomial with inflection points at 4.0, 2.6, 2.1 and 1.1 au. We analyze these specific regions and find that they are associated with physical phenomena in the comet's evolution. Contrary to other reports, the lightcurve shows no evidence for the comet having been in outburst at discovery. Afrho values derived from the visual lightcurve data are consistent with a r$^{-1.5}$ dependence on heliocentric distance, which is similar in shape to those derived from spectroscopy and narrow-band photometry. We present correlation equations for visual magnitudes and CO and H2O production rates, which are consistent with the pre-perihelion visual magnitudes increasing almost entirely due to CO outgassing until a heliocentric distance of about 2.6 - 3.0 au. We also present two correlation equations that should prove highly useful for observation planning and data analysis, and can be generalized to be applicable to other comets.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access25 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.