The Virial Relation and Intrinsic Shape of Early-Type Galaxies

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Abstract

Early-type galaxies (ETGs) are supposed to follow the virial relation M=keσ∗2Re/GM = k_e σ_*^2 R_e / G, with MM being the mass, σ∗σ_* being the stellar velocity dispersion, ReR_e being the effective radius, GG being Newton's constant, and kek_e being the virial factor, a geometry factor of order unity. Applying this relation to (a) the ATLAS3D sample of Cappellari et al. (2013) and (b) the sample of Saglia et al. (2016) gives ensemble-averaged factors ⟨ke⟩=5.15±0.09\langle k_e\rangle =5.15\pm0.09 and ⟨ke⟩=4.01±0.18\langle k_e\rangle =4.01\pm0.18, respectively, with the difference arising from different definitions of effective velocity dispersions. The two datasets reveal a statistically significant tilt of the empirical relation relative to the theoretical virial relation such that M∝(σ∗2Re)0.92M\propto(σ_*^2R_e)^{0.92}. This tilt disappears when replacing ReR_e with the semi-major axis of the projected half-light ellipse, aa. All best-fit scaling relations show zero intrinsic scatter, implying that the mass plane of ETGs is fully determined by the virial relation. Whenever a comparison is possible, my results are consistent with, and confirm, the results by Cappellari et al. (2013). The difference between the relations using either aa or ReR_e arises from a known lack of highly elliptical high-mass galaxies; this leads to a scaling (1−ε)∝M0.12(1-ε) \propto M^{0.12}, with εε being the ellipticity and Re=a1−εR_e = a\sqrt{1-ε}. Accordingly, aa, not ReR_e, is the correct proxy for the scale radius of ETGs. By geometry, this implies that early-type galaxies are axisymmetric and oblate in general, in agreement with published results from modeling based on kinematics and light distributions.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.