Paper detail

The Virial Relation and Intrinsic Shape of Early-Type Galaxies

Early-type galaxies (ETGs) are supposed to follow the virial relation $M = k_e σ_*^2 R_e / G$, with $M$ being the mass, $σ_*$ being the stellar velocity dispersion, $R_e$ being the effective radius, $G$ being Newton's constant, and $k_e$ being the virial factor, a geometry factor of order unity. Applying this relation to (a) the ATLAS3D sample of Cappellari et al. (2013) and (b) the sample of Saglia et al. (2016) gives ensemble-averaged factors $\langle k_e\rangle =5.15\pm0.09$ and $\langle k_e\rangle =4.01\pm0.18$, respectively, with the difference arising from different definitions of effective velocity dispersions. The two datasets reveal a statistically significant tilt of the empirical relation relative to the theoretical virial relation such that $M\propto(σ_*^2R_e)^{0.92}$. This tilt disappears when replacing $R_e$ with the semi-major axis of the projected half-light ellipse, $a$. All best-fit scaling relations show zero intrinsic scatter, implying that the mass plane of ETGs is fully determined by the virial relation. Whenever a comparison is possible, my results are consistent with, and confirm, the results by Cappellari et al. (2013). The difference between the relations using either $a$ or $R_e$ arises from a known lack of highly elliptical high-mass galaxies; this leads to a scaling $(1-ε) \propto M^{0.12}$, with $ε$ being the ellipticity and $R_e = a\sqrt{1-ε}$. Accordingly, $a$, not $R_e$, is the correct proxy for the scale radius of ETGs. By geometry, this implies that early-type galaxies are axisymmetric and oblate in general, in agreement with published results from modeling based on kinematics and light distributions.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.