Paper detail

The Virial Balance of Clumps and Cores in Molecular Clouds

We study the instantaneous virial balance of clumps and cores (CCs) in 3D simulations of driven, MHD, isothermal molecular clouds (MCs). The models represent a range of magnetic field strengths in MCs from subcritical to non-magnetic regimes. We identify CCs at different density thresholds, and for each object, we calculate all the terms that enter the Eulerian form of the virial theorem (EVT). A CC is considered gravitationally bound when the gravitational term in the EVT is larger than the amount for the system to be virialized, which is more stringent than the condition that it be large enough to make the total volume energy negative. We also calculate, quantities commonly used in the observations to indicate the state of gravitational boundedness of CCs such as the Jeans number J_c, the mass-to magnetic flux ratio mu_c, and the virial parameter alpha_vir. Our results show that: a) CCs are dynamical out-of-equilibrium structures. b) The surface energies are of the same order than their volume counterparts c) CCs are either in the process of being compressed or dispersed by the velocity field. Yet, not all CCs that have a compressive net kinetic energy are gravitationally bound. d) There is no 1-to-1 correspondence between the state of gravitational boundedness of a CC as described by the virial analysis or as implied by the classical indicators. In general, in the virial analysis, we observe that only the inner regions of the objects are gravitationally bound, whereas J_c, alpha_vir, and mu_c estimates tend to show that they are more gravitationally bound at the lowest threshold levels and more magnetically supercritical. g) We observe, in the non-magnetic simulation, the existence of a bound core with structural and dynamical properties that resemble those of the Bok globule Barnard 68 (B68).

preprint2007arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.