Paper detail

The VIMOS VLT Deep Survey: the redshift distribution N(z) of magnitude-limited samples down to iAB=24.75 and KsAB=22

We measure and analyse the redshift distribution N(z) of magnitude-selected samples using spectroscopic redshift measurement from the magnitude-selected VIMOS VLT Deep Survey (VVDS) with 17<iAB<24.75. We compute the N(z) and provide reference parametric fits for i band, J, H and Ks band magnitud limited samples. The N(z) of a sample with iAB<24 has a mean redshift z=0.92, with 8.2% of the galaxies with z>2. Down to iAB<24.75 the sample has a mean redshift z=1.15 and 17.1% of the galaxies are beyond z=2. The projected sky density is 2.07+/-0.12 gal/arcmin2 at 1.4<z<2.5 and KsAB<22.5, 1.72+/-0.15 gal/arcmin2 at 2.7<z<3.4 and 0.59+/-0.09 gal/arcmin2 at 3.4<z<4.5 brighter than iAB=24.75. Galaxies at z~3 identified from magnitude-selected samples are 1.5 to 3 times more numerous than when they are colour-colour selected. We demonstrate that colour-colour selected samples over 1.4<z<4.5 are strongly contaminated by galaxies at other redshifts. Semi-analytic models on the Millennium simulations under-predict the number of luminous star-forming galaxies at z\sim1.8-2, as well as over-predict the number of low-luminosity galaxies at z<0.8. Our study provides comprehensive galaxy number counts N(z) from galaxies with spectroscopic redshifts over a large redshift domain 0<z<5, a solid basis for the measurement of volume-complete quantities. Magnitude-selected surveys identify a higher number of galaxies at z>2 than in colour-colour selected samples, and we use the magnitude-selected VVDS to emphasize the large uncertainties associated to other surveys using colour or colour-colour selected samples. Our results further demonstrate that semi-analytical models on dark matter simulations have yet to find the right balance of physical processes and time-scales to properly reproduce a fundamental galaxy population property like the observed N(z).

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access23 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.