Abstract

We investigate the higher-order correlation properties of the VIMOS Public Extragalactic Redshift Survey (VIPERS) to test the hierarchical scaling hypothesis at z~1 and the dependence on galaxy luminosity, stellar mass, and redshift. We also aim to assess deviations from the linearity of galaxy bias independently from a previously performed analysis of our survey (Di Porto et al. 2014). We have measured the count probability distribution function in cells of radii 3 < R < 10 Mpc/h, deriving σ8gσ_{8g}, the volume-averaged two-,three-,and four-point correlation functions and the normalized skewness S3gS_{3g} and kurtosis S4gS_{4g} for volume-limited subsamples covering the ranges −19.5≤MB(z=1.1)−5log(h)≤−21.0-19.5 \le M_B(z=1.1)-5log(h) \le -21.0, 9.0<log(M∗/M⊙h−2)≤11.09.0 < log(M*/M_{\odot} h^{-2}) \le 11.0, 0.5≤z<1.10.5 \le z < 1.1. We have thus performed the first measurement of high-order correlations at z~1 in a spectroscopic redshift survey. Our main results are the following. 1) The hierarchical scaling holds throughout the whole range of scale and z. 2) We do not find a significant dependence of S3gS_{3g} on luminosity (below z=0.9 S3gS_{3g} decreases with luminosity but only at 1σ-level). 3) We do not detect a significant dependence of S3gS_{3g} and S4gS_{4g} on scale, except beyond z~0.9, where the dependence can be explained as a consequence of sample variance. 4) We do not detect an evolution of S3gS_{3g} and S4gS_{4g} with z. 5) The linear bias factor b=σ8g/σ8mb=σ_{8g}/σ_{8m} increases with z, in agreement with previous results. 6) We quantify deviations from the linear bias by means of the Taylor expansion parameter b2b_2. Our results are compatible with a null non-linear bias term, but taking into account other available data we argue that there is evidence for a small non-linear bias term.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.