Paper detail

THE VELOCITY OF THE EMITTING PLASMA OF THE SUPERLUMINAL GALACTIC SOURCE GRS 1915+105

We calculate the flux and size ratio of radio emitting features moving in antiparallel directions at relativistic speeds, taking into account that the pattern we observe may move at a velocity different from the one of the emitting plasma. Both velocities can be determined in sources in which both the approaching and the receding features are observed. This is the case of the galactic superluminal source GRS 1915+105, for which the pattern speed (responsible for the apparent superluminal velocity) was found to be 0.92$c$. For this source we find that the velocity of the plasma is 0.73$c$. The found velocity helps decreasing the estimate of the associated kinetic power. Since intrinsically identical knots will be observed to have different sizes, high resolution radio observations of GRS 1915+105 will be a test for the proposed difference of the pattern and plasma velocities.

preprint1995arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.