Paper detail

The Variation in Molecular Gas Depletion Time among Nearby Galaxies: What are the Main Parameter Dependencies?

We re-analyze correlations between global molecular gas depletion time (Tdep) and galaxy parameters including stellar mass, specific star formation rate (sSFR), stellar mass surface density and concentration index. The analysis is based on the COLD GASS survey, which includes galaxies with stellar mass in the range 10^10 - 10^11.5 Msun with molecular gas mass estimates derived from CO(1-0) line measurements. We improve on previous work by Saintonge et al. (2011b) by estimating SFRs using the combination of GALEX FUV and WISE 22 micron data and by deriving Tdep within a fixed aperture set by the IRAM beam size. In our new study we find correlations with much smaller scatter. Dependences of the Tdep on galaxy structural parameters such as stellar mass surface density and concentration index are now weak or absent. Differences with previous work arise because dust extinction correlates strongly with galaxy structural parameters. We further demonstrate that the 'primary' global parameter correlation is between Tdep and sSFR; all other remaining correlations can be shown to be induced by this primary dependence. This implies that galaxies with high current-to-past-averaged star formation activity, will drain their molecular gas reservoir sooner. We then analyze molecular gas depletion times on 1-kpc scales in galactic disks using data from the HERACLES survey. There is remarkably good agreement between the global Tdep versus sSFR relation for the COLD GASS galaxies and that derived for 1 kpc scale grid regions in disks. The strong correlation between Tdep and sSFR extends continuously over a factor of 10 in Tdep from log(SFR/M*) = -11.5 to -9, i.e. from nearly quiescent patches of the disk to disk regions with very strong star formation. This leads to the conclusion that the local molecular gas depletion time in galactic disks is dependent on the local fraction of young-to-old stars.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.