Paper detail

The Value of Progenitor Radius Measurements for Explosion Modeling of Type II-Plateau Supernovae

Using Modules for Experiments in Stellar Astrophysics (MESA)+STELLA, we show that very different physical models can adequately reproduce a specific observed Type II-Plateau Supernova (SN). We consider SN2004A, SN2004et, SN2009ib, SN2017eaw, and SN2017gmr, Nickel-rich ($M_\mathrm{Ni}>0.03M_\odot$) events with bolometric lightcurves and a well-sampled decline from the plateau. These events also have constraints on the progenitor radius, via a progenitor image, or, in the case of SN2017gmr, a radius from fitting shock-cooling models. In general, many explosions spanning the parameter space of progenitors can yield excellent lightcurve and Fe line velocity agreement, demonstrating the success of scaling laws in motivating models which match plateau properties for a given radius and highlighting the degeneracy between plateau luminosity and velocity in models and observed events, which can span over 50% in ejecta mass, radius, and explosion energy. This can help explain disagreements in explosion properties reported for the same event using different model calculations. Our calculations yield explosion properties when combined with pre-explosion progenitor radius measurements or a robust understanding of the outermost $<0.1\,M_\odot$ of material that quantifies the progenitor radius from SN observations a few days after explosion.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.