Paper detail

The Value-of-Information in Matching with Queues

We consider the problem of \emph{optimal matching with queues} in dynamic systems and investigate the value-of-information. In such systems, the operators match tasks and resources stored in queues, with the objective of maximizing the system utility of the matching reward profile, minus the average matching cost. This problem appears in many practical systems and the main challenges are the no-underflow constraints, and the lack of matching-reward information and system dynamics statistics. We develop two online matching algorithms: Learning-aided Reward optimAl Matching ($\mathtt{LRAM}$) and Dual-$\mathtt{LRAM}$ ($\mathtt{DRAM}$) to effectively resolve both challenges. Both algorithms are equipped with a learning module for estimating the matching-reward information, while $\mathtt{DRAM}$ incorporates an additional module for learning the system dynamics. We show that both algorithms achieve an $O(ε+δ_r)$ close-to-optimal utility performance for any $ε>0$, while $\mathtt{DRAM}$ achieves a faster convergence speed and a better delay compared to $\mathtt{LRAM}$, i.e., $O(δ_{z}/ε+ \log(1/ε)^2))$ delay and $O(δ_z/ε)$ convergence under $\mathtt{DRAM}$ compared to $O(1/ε)$ delay and convergence under $\mathtt{LRAM}$ ($δ_r$ and $δ_z$ are maximum estimation errors for reward and system dynamics). Our results reveal that information of different system components can play very different roles in algorithm performance and provide a systematic way for designing joint learning-control algorithms for dynamic systems.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.