Paper detail

The Vacuum Energy Density for Spherical and Cylindrical Universes

The vacuum energy density (Casimir energy) corresponding to a massless scalar quantum field living in different universes (mainly no-boundary ones), in several dimensions, is calculated. Hawking's zeta function regularization procedure supplemented with a very simple binomial expansion is shown to be a rigorous and well suited method for performing the analysis. It is compared with other, much more involved techniques. The principal-part prescription is used to deal with the poles that eventually appear. Results of the analysis are the absence of poles at four dimensions (for a 4d Riemann sphere and for a 4d cylinder of 3d Riemann spherical section), the total coincidence of the results corresponding to a 3d and a 4d cylinder (the first after pole subtraction), and the fact that the vacuum energy density for cylinders is (in absolute value) over an order of magnitude smaller than for spheres of the same dimension.

preprint1993arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.