Paper detail

The UV-continuum properties of Ly alpha selected galaxies at z=6.5

We report the first space-based very deep near-infrared continuum observations of a uniform sample of z = 6.5 galaxies with log(L(L_alpha)) = 42.5 - 43 erg/s selected from narrow-band line searches and with spectroscopically confirmed Ly alpha emission. The 1.4 micron HST WFC3 observations are deep enough (AB(1 sigma) = 28.75) to measure individual continuum magnitudes at this redshift for all of the objects. We compare the results with continuum-selected samples at the same redshift and find that Ly alpha emission is present in 24% of all galaxies with M_AB(1350 A) < -20 at z = 6.5. The error in this quantity is dominated by systematic uncertainties, which could be as large as multiplicative factors of three. The Ly alpha galaxies are extended but small (size < 1 kpc), and have star formation rates of approximately 10 Msun/yr. We find a mean L(Ly alpha)/(nu L_nu) at 1400A of 0.08, with the seven objects showing a range from 0.026 to 0.26, implying that there is little sign of destruction of the Ly alpha line. All of the properties of the z = 6.5 sample appear to be very similar to those of Ly alpha emitters at lower redshifts.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.