Paper detail

The universality of self-organisation: a path to an atom printer?

In 1989, Eigler and Schweizer spelt the letters IBM by positioning 35 individual Xenon atoms at 4 Kelvin temperature. The arrangement took approximately 22 hours. This was an outstanding demonstration of control over individual atoms. Since then, 3D printers developed into a near-ubiquitous technology. Nevertheless, with typical resolutions in the micrometres, they are far from the atomic scale of control that the IBM demonstration seemed to herald. Even the highest resolution achieved with ultrafast lasers driving two-photon polymerization barely reaches 100 nm, three orders of magnitude distant from the atomic scale. Here, we adopt a long-term view when we ask about the possibility of a 3D atom printer, which can build an arbitrarily shaped object of macroscopic dimensions with control over its atomic structure at room temperature. After discussing the state-of-the-art technology based on direct laser writing, we identify three fundamental challenges. The first is the fat fingers problem, i.e., laser wavelengths are much larger than the size of the atoms. The second one is complexity explosion; namely, the number of processing steps scales with the inverse cube of the resolution, leading to prohibitively long processing times. The third challenge is the increasing strength of random fluctuations as we approach the atomic scale. This requires control over the fluctuations, which we call mischief of fluctuations. Although direct-writing techniques offer sufficient resolution, speed, and excellent flexibility for the mesoscopic scale, each of the three fundamental problems appears enough to render the atomic scale unreachable. In contrast, these three challenges are not fundamental limitations to self-organisation. We propose a potential path to a 3D atom printer, where laser-driven self-organisation can complement direct-writing techniques by bridging the atomic and mesoscopic scales.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.