Paper detail

The uniqueness of a distance-regular graph with intersection array {32,27,8,1;1,4,27,32} and related results

It is known that, up to isomorphism, there is a unique distance-regular graph $Δ$ with intersection array {32,27;1,12} (equivalently, $Δ$ is the unique strongly regular graph with parameters (105,32,4,12)). Here we investigate the distance-regular antipodal covers of $Δ$. We show that, up to isomorphism, there is just one distance-regular antipodal triple cover of $Δ$ (a graph $\hatΔ$ discovered by the author over twenty years ago), proving that there is a unique distance-regular graph with intersection array {32,27,8,1;1,4,27,32}. In the process, we confirm an unpublished result of Steve Linton that there is no distance-regular antipodal double cover of $Δ$, and so no distance-regular graph with intersection array {32,27,6,1;1,6,27,32}. We also show there is no distance-regular antipodal 4-cover of $Δ$, and so no distance-regular graph with intersection array {32,27,9,1;1,3,27,32}, and that there is no distance-regular antipodal 6-cover of $Δ$ that is a double cover of $\hatΔ$.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.