Paper detail

The unifying theory of scaling in thermal convection: The updated prefactors

The unifying theory of scaling in thermal convection (Grossmann & Lohse (2000)) (henceforth the GL theory) suggests that there are no pure power laws for the Nusselt and Reynolds numbers as function of the Rayleigh and Prandtl numbers in the experimentally accessible parameter regime. In Grossmann & Lohse (2001) the dimensionless parameters of the theory were fitted to 155 experimental data points by Ahlers & Xu (2001) in the regime $3\times 10^7 \le Ra \le 3 \times 10^{9}$ and $4\le Pr \le 34$ and Grossmann & Lohse (2002) used the experimental data point from Qiu & Tong (2001) and the fact that Nu(Ra,Pr) is independent of the parameter a, which relates the dimensionless kinetic boundary thickness with the square root of the wind Reynolds number, to fix the Reynolds number dependence. Meanwhile the theory is on one hand well confirmed through various new experiments and numerical simulations. On the other hand these new data points provide the basis for an updated fit in a much larger parameter space. Here we pick four well established (and sufficiently distant) Nu(Ra,Pr) data points and show that the resulting Nu(Ra,Pr) function is in agreement with almost all established experimental and numerical data up to the ultimate regime of thermal convection, whose onset also follows from the theory. One extra Re(Ra,Pr) data point is used to fix Re(Ra,Pr). As Re can depend on the definition and the aspect ratio the transformation properties of the GL equations are discussed in order to show how the GL coefficients can easily be adapted to new Reynolds number data while keeping Nu(Ra,Pr) unchanged.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.