Paper detail

The uniform Kruskal theorem: between finite combinatorics and strong set existence

The uniform Kruskal theorem extends the original result for trees to general recursive data types. As shown by A. Freund, M. Rathjen and A. Weiermann, it is equivalent to $Π^1_1$-comprehension, over $\mathsf{RCA_0}$ with the chain antichain principle ($\mathsf{CAC}$). This result provides a connection between finite combinatorics and abstract set existence. The present paper sheds further light on this connection. First, we show that the original Kruskal theorem is equivalent to the uniform version for data types that are finitely generated. Secondly, we prove a dichotomy result for a natural variant of the uniform Kruskal theorem. On the one hand, this variant still implies $Π^1_1$-comprehension over $\mathsf{RCA}_0+\mathsf{CAC}$. On the other hand, it becomes weak when $\mathsf{CAC}$ is removed from the base theory.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.