Paper detail

The Unified Model of Active Galactic Nuclei: II. Evolutionary Connection

(Abbreviated) We assemble a sample composed of 243 nearby Seyfert galaxies with redshifts $z\le 0.05$ to test the unification scheme. The sample contains 94 BLS1s, 44 NLS1s, 36 X-ray absorbed HBLR S2s, 42 X-ray absorbed non-HBLR S2s and 27 X-ray unabsorbed Seyfert 2s (unabsorbed non-HBLR S2s and HBLR S2s). We find that: 1) NLS1s have less massive black hole masses than BLS1s; 2) HBLRS2s have the same mass distribution of the black holes with BLS1s; 3) the absorbed non-HBLR S2s have less massive black holes than HBLR S2s; 4) unabsorbed non-HBLR S2s have the most massive black holes. We thus have a queue of black hole masses from small to large: narrow to broad line Seyfert galaxies, providing new evidence for the evolutionary sequence of Seyfert galaxies. We find that the opening angles of the torus in NLS1s and absorbed non-HBLR S2s are significantly smaller than that in BLS1s and HBLR S2s. The growth of the black holes and increases of the opening angles of the tori determine the various appearances of Seyfert galaxies. We also find that the unabsorbed Seyfert 2 galaxies could be caused by low gas-to-dust ratios in the present sample. This indicates that the star formation histories could be different in the unabsorbed from in absorbed Seyfert 2 galaxies, showing evidence for suppressed star formation by black hole activities. We outline a new unification scheme based on the orientation hypothesis: Seyfert galaxies can be unified by including growth of black holes, Eddington ratios, changing opening angles of tori and gas-to-dust ratios in the tori. Seyfert galaxies are tending to finally evolve to unabsorbed non-HBLR Seyfert 2 galaxies, in which the black holes are accreting with low accretion rates and both the broad line region and dusty torus disappear.

preprint2007arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.