Paper detail

The ultraviolet continuum slopes ($\mathbfβ$) of galaxies at $\mathbf{z\simeq8-16}$ from JWST and ground-based near-infrared imaging

We study the rest-frame ultraviolet (UV) continuum slopes ($β$) of galaxies at redshifts $8 < z < 16$, using a combination of JWST ERO and ERS NIRcam imaging and ground-based near-infrared imaging of the COSMOS field. The combination of JWST and ground-based imaging provides a wide baseline in both redshift and absolute UV magnitude ($-22.6 < M_{\rm UV} < 17.9$), sufficient to allow a meaningful comparison to previous results at lower redshift. Using a power-law fitting technique, we find that our full sample (median $M_{\rm UV}=-19.3\pm 1.3$) returns an inverse-variance weighted mean value of $\langle β\rangle = -2.10 \pm 0.05$, with a corresponding median value of $β=-2.29\pm 0.09$. These values imply that the UV colours of galaxies at $z>8$ are, on average, no bluer than the bluest galaxies in the local Universe. Moreover, we find evidence for a $β-M_{\rm UV}$ relation, such that brighter UV galaxies display redder UV slopes ($\rm{d}β/ \rm{d} M_{\rm UV} = -0.17 \pm 0.05$). Comparing to results at lower redshift, we find that the slope of our $β-M_{\rm UV}$ relation is consistent with the slope observed at $z\simeq 5$ and that, at a given $M_{\rm UV}$, our $8<z<16$ galaxies are somewhat bluer than their $z\simeq 5$ counterparts, with an inverse-variance weighted mean offset of $\langle Δβ\rangle = -0.38 \pm 0.09$. We do not find strong evidence that any objects in our sample display ultra-blue UV continuum slopes (i.e., $β\lesssim-3$) that would require their UV emission to be dominated by ultra-young, dust-free stellar populations with high Lyman-continuum escape fractions. Comparing our results to the predictions of theoretical galaxy formation models, we find that the galaxies in our sample are consistent with the young, metal-poor and moderately dust-reddened galaxies expected at $z>8$.

preprint2023arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access10 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.