Paper detail

The Two-user Causal Cognitive Interference Channel: Novel Outer Bounds and Constant Gap Result for the Symmetric Gaussian Noise Channel in Weak Interference

This paper studies the two-user Causal Cognitive Interference Channel (CCIC), where two transmitters aim to communicate independent messages to two different receivers via a common channel. One source, referred to as the cognitive, is capable of overhearing the other source, referred to as the primary, through a noisy in-band link and thus can assist in sending the primary's data. Two novel outer bounds of the type $2R_p+R_c$ and $R_p+2R_c$ are derived for the class of injective semi-deterministic CCICs where the noises at the different source-destination pairs are independent. An achievable rate region is derived based on Gelfand-Pinsker binning, superposition coding and simultaneous decoding at the receivers. The lower and outer bounds are then specialized to the practically relevant Gaussian noise case. The authors of this paper recently characterized to within a constant gap the capacity of the symmetric Gaussian CCIC in (a) the strong interference regime, and (b) for a subset of the weak interference regime when the cooperation link is larger than a given threshold. This work characterizes to within a constant gap the capacity for the symmetric Gaussian CCIC in the regime that was still open. In particular, it is shown that the novel outer bounds are necessary to characterize the capacity to within a constant gap when the cooperation link is weaker than the direct links, that is, in this regime unilateral cooperation leaves some system resources underutilized.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.