Paper detail

The Two States of Star Forming Clouds

We examine the effects of self-gravity and magnetic fields on supersonic turbulence in isothermal molecular clouds with high resolution simulations and adaptive mesh refinement. These simulations use large root grids (512^3) to capture turbulence and four levels of refinement to capture high density, for an effective resolution of 8,196^3. Three Mach 9 simulations are performed, two super-Alfvénic and one trans-Alfvénic. We find that gravity splits the clouds into two populations, one low density turbulent state and one high density collapsing state. The low density state exhibits properties similar to non-self-gravitating in this regime, and we examine the effects of varied magnetic field strength on statistical properties: the density probability distribution function is approximately lognormal; velocity power spectral slopes decrease with field strength; alignment between velocity and magnetic field increases with field; the magnetic field probability distribution can be fit to a stretched exponential. The high density state is characterized by self-similar spheres; the density PDF is a power-law; collapse rate decreases with increasing mean field; density power spectra have positive slopes, P(ρ,k) \propto k; thermal-to-magnetic pressure ratios are unity for all simulations; dynamic-to-magnetic pressure ratios are larger than unity for all simulations; magnetic field distribution is a power-law. The high Alfvén Mach numbers in collapsing regions explain recent observations of magnetic influence decreasing with density. We also find that the high density state is found in filaments formed by converging flows, consistent with recent Herschel observations. Possible modifications to existing star formation theories are explored.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access7 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.