Paper detail

The Two-Point Correlation Function of Rich Clusters of Galaxies: Results from an Extended APM Cluster Redshift Survey

We present new estimates of the spatial two-point correlation function of rich clusters of galaxies selected from the APM Galaxy Survey. We have measured redshifts for a sample of $364$ clusters out to a depth of $\sim 450\hmpc$. The clusters have a mean space density of $\bar{n} = 3.4\times 10^{-5}\hmpccc$. The two-point correlation function, $ξ_{cc}$, for this sample is equal to unity at a pair-separation of $r_0 = 14.3\pm1.75\hmpc$ (2$σ$ errors), consistent with our earlier results from a smaller sample. The new observations provide an accurate determination of the shape of $ξ_{cc}$ to pair-separations of about $50\hmpc$. Our results show that $ξ_{cc}$ has a higher amplitude than expected according to the standard $Ω=1$ cold dark matter (CDM) model on spatial scales $2\simlt s \simlt 50\hmpc$, but are in good agreement with scale-invariant fluctuations in either a low density CDM model or a critical density universe made up of a mixture of hot and cold dark matter. Our results provide strong constraints on so called `co-operative' models of galaxy formation in which the galaxy formation process introduces large-scale structure in the galaxy distribution.

preprint1994arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.